|   By
    Hank Marquis Measuring and reporting on IT efficiency 
	and effectiveness is critical.  The ITIL mentions
	Continuous Service 
	Improvement Programs (CSIP), Goals,
	Critical Success 
	Factors (CSFs) a.k.a. Key Success Factors, and
	Key Performance 
	Indicators (KPIs) as the means to measure success.       A CSIP establishes goals based on 
	business drivers and stakeholders.  CSFs are important performance aspects 
	of CSIP goals. KPIs measure CSFs to show achievement of CSIP objectives.  
	Together CSFs and KPIs track IT performance.     The ITIL suggest dozens of KPIs, CobiT 
	and ISO-20000 hundreds more. [See ‘Get 
	Ready for ISO 20000 
	Certification’ DITY Vol. 2 #3 for more on ISO 20000.]   However, every CSIP has unique KPI needs that 
	require mixing people, process, and products into performance metrics, and 
	then reporting on them in business terms.  Called IT transparency, this is 
	not an easy task.   Fortunately, there is an industry 
	standard for creating effective KPI metrics linked to goals — the
	Goal Question Metric 
	(GQM) method.  GQM offers us a solution for creating transparent KPI 
	metrics.  Following we examine GQM.   Fundamentally, KPIs measure progress 
	toward goals as reflected in CSFs.  KPIs are then quantifiable measurements, 
	or metrics.  The Goal Question Metric (GQM) method arose from work done in 
	software engineering.  GQM derives metrics from questions about goals.  GQM 
	has some powerful benefits when applied to IT Service Management: 
		simple, form-driven applicationeasy to use in groupsworks with all processesproduces metrics customized to the 
		CSIPdelivers powerful insight into 
		organizational and process structurereflects the viewpoints of the 
		staff (IT, customer, stakeholder) involved   GQM requires no investment in tools or 
	software.  It is a participative and team-building program that helps drive 
	values up and down the organization.  GQM is useful in creating new 
	KPIs, but it is also very useful in clarifying your existing KPIs.  GQM is easiest to grasp when using a 
	real example, so, here is an example, loosely based on examples in the ITIL: 
	 
		The CSIP has as a goal of providing 
		best customer response among all major competitors.  One of the IT CSFs that came from 
		this goal was “quickly resolve incidents.”  A potential KPI offered in the ITIL 
		for such a CSF is “Percentage reduction in average time to respond to a call for 
		assistance.”     This KPI needs clarification and is what I refer to as a “Dr. 
	Feelgood” KPI -- it sounds nice, no one could argue with it, it seems to 
	make sense and “fit” the CSF.  However, how would you actually measure this 
	KPI?  To whom does it apply?  What does it actually measure?  It is almost 
	impossible to determine the “who, what, when, where and why” given this KPI.  
	This is where GQM is very powerful.  GQM uses a standard form to define the 
	metric and to whom or what it applies very precisely.  GQM operates at three 
	levels:  
		Conceptual/Goal:  a set of 
		objectives that represent various viewpoints relative to a specific 
		environment.  With regard to ITSM, goals are the objectives and 
		milestones of the CSIP.  Operational/Question:  a set of 
		questions about the goal that focuses characterizing the assessment or 
		achievement of a specific goal.  The answers to these questions 
		determine goal achievement.  With regard to ITSM, the questions derive 
		from the CSFs.  Quantitative/Metric:  a set of 
		measurements that answer the questions.  With regard to ITSM, the 
		metrics are KPIs.     The five questions or parts of the GQM 
	method are: 
		Object:  What is the Object 
		(product or process) under measurement?Purpose:  What is the motivation 
		behind the analysis of the Object?Focus:  Which quality attribute of 
		the Object is under study?Environment:  Under what context is 
		the measurement of the Object attribute to occur? Viewpoint:  Whose perspective 
		do measurements of the Object represent?   Let us use GQM to break down our (unclear) 
	KPI into the required parts:   
		
			| GQM Part | GQM Question | KPI Part |  
			| Object | What is the Object (product, process, 
			service, etc.) under analysis? | ?? |  
			| 
			Purpose | What is the motivation behind 
			the analysis of the Object? | Reducing the average time 
			required |  
			| Focus | Which quality attribute of the 
			Object is under analysis? | Responding to a call for 
			assistance |  
			| 
			Environment | Under what context is the 
			analysis to occur? | ?? |  
			| 
			Viewpoint  | Whose perspective does the 
			analysis of the Object reflect? | ?? |  Table 1. GQM 
	KPI Breakdown Form   Asking these five simple questions 
	quickly shows that our potential KPI of “Percentage reduction in average 
	time to respond to a call for assistance” is missing the key information 
	that actually makes it useful: 
		What is the object -- Staff 
		member?  Procedure effectiveness?  Knowledge base?  System response 
		time?  What is the purpose -- To reduce the 
		average time to respond or understand the reasons for the time it takes 
		to respond?What exactly are we going to 
		measure -- Response time?  Hold time?What is the environment -- the 
		Service Desk?  Incident Management?What is the viewpoint -- the User?  
		IT Staff member?   You begin to see the value of GQM 
	now.  Using GQM we can clarify the potential KPI into a KPI that is actually 
	useful.  We have to go back and ask more questions in order to clarify the 
	KPI.  For example:     
		
			| GQM Part | GQM Question Aid | KPI Part |  
			| Object | Analyze:  | The 
			Automated Call Distribution system |  
			| 
			Purpose | For the purpose of: | Reducing the average time 
			required |  
			| 
			Focus | With respect to: | Time spent in 
			the queue  |  
			| 
			Environment | In the context of: | Service 
			Desk during normal business hours |  
			| 
			Viewpoint | From the viewpoint of: 
			 | A 
			Business User calling the Service Desk |  Table 2. GQM 
	KPI Creation Form   We then re-write the KPI.  Here is the 
	original KPI and CSF: 
		
			| 
			CSF: | Quickly Resolve 
			Incidents. |  
			| 
			KPI: | 
	Percentage reduction in average time to respond to a call for 
			assistance. |  
	  Here is the clarified KPI and CSF: 
		
			| 
			CSF: | Quickly Resolve 
			Incidents. |  
			| 
			KPI: | Percentage 
			reduction in the average time a business user waits in the ACD queue 
			when calling the Service Desk during normal business hours. |    You can clearly see the value of GQM 
	now.  Notice how much more clearly the re-written KPI now appears.  
	Notice how it clearly indicates the “who, what, when, where and why” for the 
	KPI.  As an IT manager, you know what data to gather, and when, where 
	and why to obtain the data.  If you were the customer (or anyone else 
	inside or outside of IT) you would know what the metric meant by simply 
	reading it.  This is an important concept in achieving the IT 
	transparency required of IT/business alignment.     Also, notice that the clarified KPI only addresses a 
	portion of the CSF!  GQM will often result in many new KPIs.  Now that we 
	have re-written a KPI, you can also use GQM to create entirely new CSFs and 
	KPIs from CSIP goals.     In either case, some basic guidelines 
	apply: 
		Make sure you have management commitment supporting 
		the measurements and the evaluation of the measurements; this is naturally occurring if you drive GQM from the CSFs taken from the CSIP, and the CSIP truly represents 
		stakeholder values and needs.  However, metrics for the sake of 
		metrics are a very real and negative consequence of failure to obtain 
		management commitment before you begin with GQM.Involve stakeholders in the GQM 
		process; create a GQM team composed of IT, customer, and other 
		stakeholders in this process.  The GQM team should both assist in the 
		creation, and the analysis, of the KPI data.GQM measurements are not 
		organizational goals or project goals in themselves; they are 
		measurements of goals and 
		objectives.  Be careful not to confuse the pursuit of KPI attainment 
		with the goals themselves.Always consider the context of the 
		viewpoint; the GQM team may identify many KPIs for a single CSF, each 
		from a different context or viewpoint.  Normally one CSF will have 
		several to many KPIs.Develop metrics appropriate to the 
		object; be careful to measure attributes specific to the goal and when 
		analyzing them stay focused on the object.  Every KPI reflects a 
		singular aspect of a goal -- do not try to "read into" the KPI for 
		information beyond its clearly stated purpose.  If you need more 
		data, create a specific KPI.Involve Project Management and make 
		GQM a regular part of IT project management. Helping establish the 
		measurements of projects gives you a better chance of actually meeting 
		those objectives!Get training in GQM before moving 
		forward! One of the most difficult issues you face is to 
	measure improvement from ITIL.  The only way that works is transparency 
	-- expressing IT 
	results in business terms, linked to stakeholders.  GQM makes this easy.  GQM ties into the ITIL CSIP/CSF/KPI 
	model very nicely, and provides a straightforward means to both identify 
	improvement goals and measure their performance.  You will also find that 
	the GQM process itself helps identify process problems that you can address (and 
	measure) using additional GQM derived KPIs!  Finally, communicate the 
	results of your clarified KPIs to IT and customers, this is a tangible step 
	forward on the path toward Business/IT alignment.  -- 
		Subscribe to our newsletter and get 
		new skills delivered right to your Inbox,
		
    click here.To browse back-issues of 
	the DITY Newsletter, click here. |